|
Post by gx on Dec 15, 2017 22:41:06 GMT
a piece for piano.. i'd had a rough draft some months ago, but now it has been worked over quite a bit.. This piece starts off a duet, then, has one melodic 'line' (though,w counter lines ) carried through various registers - and doesn't really have a return, (except for a bit of an echo of the beginning at the section before the coda.) The melody or theme moves through various contexts; sections. Comments are welcome. Thank you for listening. soundcloud.com/gregoriox88/in-her-eyes-new-arr-18
|
|
|
Post by Bob Porter on Dec 18, 2017 14:44:40 GMT
Well, as you may know, I'm not a fan of piano music. So I tend not to seek it out. I don't play piano. Those that do tend to write very differently. I grew up playing trumpet. Pretty useless for composition.
But this is very nice. I can totally see it as the track for a star-crossed lovers movie.
|
|
|
Post by driscollmusick on Dec 18, 2017 19:10:47 GMT
I liked this very much, especially the ending where I felt it moved beyond a standard into something more (expanding its universe, say). You should orchestrate it!
|
|
|
Post by gx on Dec 19, 2017 14:50:04 GMT
Hey Bob, I appreciate you giving this a whirl, especially since you are not inclined to piano music.. I am glad the 'star- crossed' impression came across for you. Thank you for listening!
John, I was thinking much of the time the piano as surrogate for ensemble.. heard the opening as trumpet and stand up bass … then growing from there.. Thanks for mentioning … i may give it a try. I'm glad you liked it!
|
|
|
Post by alexandre on Dec 21, 2017 0:32:59 GMT
I'm loving piano. I liked this song, a lot. But my impression was more like 'cloudy afternoon, rain falling on the window'.
|
|
|
Post by gx on Dec 22, 2017 17:27:08 GMT
Thank you for listening, Alexandre, and offering your impression.. (there are definitely times when 'her eyes' are cloudy Cheers!
|
|
|
Post by Tim Marko on Dec 22, 2017 18:44:47 GMT
Beautiful transitions into the various sections. Very nice!
|
|
|
Post by gx on Dec 25, 2017 0:28:17 GMT
Thank so much, Tim!
|
|
|
Post by fuguestate on Jan 5, 2018 19:37:37 GMT
This isn't really my style of music, but I did quite enjoy the middle section around 1:23 or so. Very nice effect with the trills and fast figures there.
I think there is some form of return at the end, with the reappearance of the LH arpeggio figures that resemble the beginning. It does impart some sense of closure this way. I don't think a return (in the sense of a dramatic arc) necessarily has to return to the opening theme in a literal way; indirect allusions of this kind can work very well. (The string opening / closing of Sibelius' 6th symphony also answers each other in this kind of indirect way, particularly in Karajan's interpretation, which I found supremely moving.)
|
|
|
Post by gx on Jan 7, 2018 2:53:26 GMT
Hi HS! Thanks for popping in! You are right, there is an illusion to the beginning, before the coda.. (Thats what i meant by an 'echo' in the description) I'm glad there was something for you here, even though the 'style' doesn't resonate.. (btw, what 'style' are we talking about:) It's been while since I've listened to Sibelius 6th.. I have trouble dissociating Karajan's personality from his musical output, though i remember his 'smooth' sound.. Lately I've been trying to find a definitive recording of Beethoven's 6th for my brother, and listened to so many versions.. Perhaps Walter's recording w Columbia O of '58 is my favorite interpretation, though there are distortions and too much hiss in the recording… one must imagine, perhaps too much.. I much enjoy Klemperer's and Szel's, which are wonderfully transparent, and beautifully recorded.. Klemperer's is especially powerful, though just (for me) a tad slow.. It was very interesting to hear Toscanini's version with the tuning at 432 hz.. Then there's Tennstedt's which is quite solid, but then i discovered Sawallisch's version, and to me he hits the mark perfectly, except for the entrance of the coo coo .. www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwzZOIOtPPQ
|
|
|
Post by driscollmusick on Jan 7, 2018 16:49:11 GMT
Hi HS! Thanks for popping in! You are right, there is an illusion to the beginning, before the coda.. (Thats what i meant by an 'echo' in the description) I'm glad there was something for you here, even though the 'style' doesn't resonate.. (btw, what 'style' are we talking about:) It's been while since I've listened to Sibelius 6th.. I have trouble dissociating Karajan's personality from his musical output, though i remember his 'smooth' sound.. Lately I've been trying to find a definitive recording of Beethoven's 6th for my brother, and listened to so many versions.. Perhaps Walter's recording w Columbia O of '58 is my favorite interpretation, though there are distortions and too much hiss in the recording… one must imagine, perhaps too much.. I much enjoy Klemperer's and Szel's, which are wonderfully transparent, and beautifully recorded.. Klemperer's is especially powerful, though just (for me) a tad slow.. It was very interesting to hear Toscanini's version with the tuning at 432 hz.. Then there's Tennstedt's which is quite solid, but then i discovered Sawallisch's version, and to me he hits the mark perfectly, except for the entrance of the coo coo .. www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwzZOIOtPPQHave you tried the older period-influenced Rattle/Vienna? I recall someone gave me the box set and it was the best one:
|
|
|
Post by gx on Jan 8, 2018 15:01:00 GMT
Thanks John. I'll give it a whirl!
|
|
|
Post by fuguestate on Jan 8, 2018 18:05:53 GMT
Hi HS! Thanks for popping in! You are right, there is an illusion to the beginning, before the coda.. (Thats what i meant by an 'echo' in the description) I'm glad there was something for you here, even though the 'style' doesn't resonate.. (btw, what 'style' are we talking about:) Haha, TBH I don't know. As they say, there is no accounting for taste. Some kinds of music I like, others I just don't. Even I myself have a hard time explaining to myself why sometimes. I grew up with the Karajan versions of the Beethoven symphonies, and that's how I've always heard them. It wasn't until much later that I discovered, for example, that the Kleiber renditions of the 7th symphony, say, are much clearer than Karajan's version. Karajan seems to rush the finale a little too much, causing many of the parts to get blurred because it's simply too fast for the musicians to keep in sync. Well, the recording quality probably also has something to do with it, but then you can only shorten notes so much before they start turning into an indistinct mush of sonic soup. At least for the finale of the 7th, I found that Kleiber's more restrained approach brought out the lines much more clearly, and arguably showcases Beethoven's meticulous construction much better than the Karajan version. Nevertheless, some interpretations of Karajan I still find the best, e.g., Sibelius 6th, mainly because of the way he made the starting and ending string passages answer to each other. But for Sibelius' 5th, I find Karajan's interpretation rather lackluster, and e.g., the Blomstedt performance much more effective. I'll have to listen to this sometime later. Need to get back to work now... but Beethoven's 6th is one of my all-time favorites, so I'll definitely have to check this out.
|
|
|
Post by gx on Jan 8, 2018 20:02:27 GMT
John, i just had a listen to Simon Rattles 6th mov 5… I very much liked the interpretation, but i don't think it's too hard to get the last movement 'right'.. The one thing took getting used to was the 'ensemble' and smaller sound as it were.. Then i tried Rattle's 1st mov. (which to me is the most tricky ) and i was mesmerized. Wow! Really incredible.. www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TIgfbR1sCQThis totally moves up to 1st place for me… I have a David Zinman with tonhalle O Zurich, playing all the beethoven symphonies, which i very much enjoy, but haven't listened lately … so, i must now listen there.. HS - Beethoven's 6th is one of my all time favorites as well!
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hewer on Jan 8, 2018 20:53:14 GMT
Gregorio, Finally got round to this. I wasn't sure I'd go for this at first, but once you changed at 1 '.20"ish, I enjoyed its emotion and pianism much, much more and was eventually moved by its introspection.I prefer the fugal Gx, but nice all the same.....
|
|