|
Post by Dave Dexter on Sept 22, 2017 13:48:34 GMT
(Fixed. Updating with solution soon) Hey all. I'm in the scoring stage of my SATB piece and there's a weird thing happening I've not come across before. I attached a screenshot - the problem is that in a few areas, the already established key signature is shown again as in b31. At all points where this happens I've changed the staff style to 2-voice, so I can display divided parts neatly with stems up and down - so the barline at 31 is where I've split it and changed the staff. Selecting to hide the key in this new staff just disables it so the accidentals reappear - Logic seems to be treating it as a new area independent from the previous, but it doesn't happen in all cases. Mightily confused. Any help would be great. I attached the settings for the two staff styles (the 2-voice one being from b31) in case you can see something I don't. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hewer on Sept 22, 2017 17:42:30 GMT
Dave, I'm in wine rather than the studio at present, but I immediately thought that perhaps you have not joined regions together on the same track.Am I close?
|
|
|
Post by Dave Dexter on Sept 22, 2017 17:51:04 GMT
Friday is wine day. Yes, the midi regions are split - but I've done this method before and the key thing hasn't happened. And it isn't happening at all joins either, right after b31 there's about four splits and the key signature isn't repeated there. I can't think of anything different about the areas where it is happening from the areas it isn't. I attached a screenshot of the midi regions. Dave, I'm in wine rather than the studio at present, but I immediately thought that perhaps you have not joined regions together on the same track.Am I close?
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hewer on Sept 22, 2017 18:02:47 GMT
Will try and reproduce tomorrow if you haven't sussed it. Logics score page is not my strong point as I only use the DAW for sound and not score.I'm sure we or you will figure it out.
|
|
|
Post by Dave Dexter on Sept 23, 2017 9:17:18 GMT
It's a strange one, seems random and non-reproducible (except by mistake). Worst case, I score in C or just keep it as is, it doesn't make the score unreadable. Just unprofessional!
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hewer on Sept 24, 2017 14:50:06 GMT
Dave, not had a chance to see if I can help yet - will have a lookie tomorrow.
|
|