|
Post by gx on Jan 22, 2019 18:22:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hewer on Jan 23, 2019 9:23:59 GMT
I know this chart of old. I tend not to eq these days, but the chart has been useful in the past as a quick reference if a track turned out muddy, especially a hybrid (not purely orchestral) track.
|
|
|
Post by driscollmusick on Jan 23, 2019 14:16:18 GMT
I know this chart of old. I tend not to eq these days, but the chart has been useful in the past as a quick reference if a track turned out muddy, especially a hybrid (not purely orchestral) track. Mike, did you attach or link something to this post? Edit: Nevermind. Read these in the wrong order.
|
|
|
Post by driscollmusick on Jan 23, 2019 16:03:40 GMT
G, I just went through one of my tracks and started tweaking the EQ, using this chart. Actually pretty happy with the results! Another step to add to the workflow...
|
|
|
Post by Bob Porter on Jan 23, 2019 17:17:42 GMT
Some things to think about. While there are recording and mixing standards to be followed, no two people hear alike. Just as no two playback systems are alike. So we settle for a compromise. But there's more to it than that. In my case, my hearing starts to drop off dramatically starting at roughly midrange. the beep of my micro range is lost to me if I am too far away. Which prompted me to get hearing aids so that I wouldn't starve. Using headphones is my best option for music, though close speakers are OK. Any more, I might not have a full picture of what sounds good or real, and what doesn't. I'm just throwing that out there, because hearing can be really subjective.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hewer on Jan 24, 2019 9:44:45 GMT
Bob, It sucks getting on right? Have a look at the link below, it may be of interest as a solution if you haven't seen it already. There are others available I believe, so have a hunt around. www.wired.co.uk/article/test-ai-headphones
|
|